Ambulance Driver

Reflections of a Prehospital Care Paramedic

Archive for the ‘911 Update’ Category

Concerns Over Patient Confidentiality Part III

without comments

Over the past few days Ambulance Driver has had several conversations with the ambulance department operations manager concerning this blog’s 911 Update series. On my initiative alone, and not at the urging of my employer, the following changes have been made – in addition to those policies referenced here.

  • My bio, which only appeared for a very few days, has been removed.
  • My employer is not named on the blog
  • In the 911 Update series, the reader cannot trust the day of service, the patient’s age, sex, or location. The order in which the runs occurred also cannot be trusted.

What remains could be described as a “fictionalized” account of a typical day in the life of an urban Paramedic. Were the runs actually made and was the “essence” of the calls preserved?  The answer is “yes.”  Will the reader be able to track a specific call to a specific patient?  My answer to that is, “I don’t see how anyone could.”

In addition to all of this, it has come to the Ambulance Driver’s attention that many of his co-workers are using MySpace, Facebook and Twitter in a manner that has not been as circumspect as this writer has attempted to be

Be forewarned.

Written by Duke

March 12th, 2009 at 7:44 am

911 Update

without comments

Sorry, but Ambulance Driver is a couple of days behind in the Update. On March 9th our Department had 98 calls in my 12 hour shift. Busy day, but we only handled 6 of them.

  • Call #1  was for a elderly lady in a nursing home that was mildly hypotensive, weak and thought to be suffering from dehydration.
  • Call #2 was for a young man with a chronic disease who had stopped taking his meds and hadn’t seen a doctor for while. Ended up at a clinic wondering why he felt so bad.
  • Call #3 was for a middle age man who broke his ankle running down the basement stairs. He really like the morphine.
  • Call #4 was for a nursing home patient with a sudden allergic reaction that threatened to close the airway. Epinephrine and Benadryl came in very handy.
  • Call # 5 involved an elderly lady with non-traumatic hip pain. Previous hip replacement
  • Call #6 was for a jaywalker who got run over by a car that was exiting a parking lot. The tires ran over the paitent’s legs, at least one of which was fractured. No other injury.

Written by Duke

March 11th, 2009 at 8:44 pm

Posted in 911 Update

911 Update

with 2 comments

Steady day at the ambulance service. We had 77 calls during my 12 hour shift, the Ambulance Driver responded to 7.

  • Call #1 Spent a delightful 45 minutes with a gentleman in his mid-90’s. Active, vigorous and with all his marbles. Had lived in the same house for nearly 70 years. The downer is that he stumbled on a doorway threshold and broke his hip.
  • Call #2  One reason we have overuse of hospital emergency rooms is that our public health care programs in Minnesota incent people to do so. No co-pays for ambulance service, ER visits or medications in most cases. Goods or services that are highly valued, such as health care, will be over used if it costs little or nothing. Call #2 was a fella that had been constipated for 5 days. He walked out to meet us as we arrived.
  • Call #3  was a female who got drunk last night, woke up woozy and fell in the bathroom. Nice shiner over right eye with a small laceration.
  • Call #4  Even under the best of circumstances, nursing home patients fall down a lot. Female toppled over while using a walker. Forehead laceration. No other injury noted.
  • Call #5  A road rage incident between 2 vehicles ended up with 2 innocent vehicles being run off the road. Moderate damage to vehicles, minor damage to 2 of the total of 7 occupants.
  • Call # 6 As we have seen, not all chest pain is cardiac related. Male with chest pain, normal EKG, not relieved by NTG. Confirmed non-cardiac by ER later but still didn’t have a diagnosis.
  • Call #7.  Isolated femur fractures are a relatively rare occurance. I seem to see one every 2-3 years. Today I saw my second one in three months. Young male slipped on an icy driveway while collecting his mail. Traction splint and morphine helped ease the pain during transport. He’ll probably heal fine but will have a tough time over the next 4-6 months.

That’s it. We’ll do it all over tomorrow.

Written by Duke

March 8th, 2009 at 5:00 pm

Posted in 911 Update

Concerns Over Patient Confidentiality Part II

with 4 comments

One of the main goals of this blog is to link the affect of public policy to the delivery of health care, especially as it relates to emergency medical services. An example would be how the public investment in a statewide radio network positively enhanced various public agencies’ performance during the I-35 bridge collapse and the Republican National Convention. There are many such issues that seem to be fertile ground for public discussion.

 

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA, however, was not one that had immediately come to mind.

 

Soon after this website’s beginnings, a reader forwarded an anonymous email voicing the concern that Ambulance Driver, in its 911 Update series, was violating HIPAA laws as it pertained to patient confidentiality. This was rather surprising given the care given not to disclose personal health information and the efforts made not to link data to a specific patient.

 

Since this subject has been dropped in the lap of Ambulance Driver, and it does directly relate to the goal stated above, we may as well talk about it.

 

The first call was made to the Ambulance Department manager requesting to have this blog’s content reviewed by the hospital’s HIPAA compliance officer.This request was made March 3rd and, in what may very well be a

bureaucratic world record, a reply was sent the very next day.

 

Permission has not been granted to disclose the reply but a fair synopsis would be:

  • A policy on this subject is in the works
  • Providing dates of service is a problem
  • Providing location of service any more specific than a state is a problem.
  • Blogging on the course of your work is not advisable
  • Blogging on the subject of patient care is not advisable

Ambulance Driver is unconvinced that a patient’s identity could be gleaned from the information provided on its 911 Updates. However, after reviewing a legal summary of the law, one has to admit that the employer’s reasoning does have merit. HIPAA is a morass. For a health care agency to be cautious is just being prudent. The employer did not write the law, they are merely trying to comply.

 

HIPAA law seems to indicate that one may state, “I picked up a patient in Illinois last week with a broken leg.” On the other hand one may not say, “On March 2nd I picked up a patient in Chicago with a broken leg.” Seems silly, doesn’t it?

 

While not discussed in their response, the employer probably has some other thoughts on this topic. They have thousands of employees, hundreds of which may use social networks such as Twitter, Facebook and My Space. A few may be blogging. In this context, protection of patient confidentiality would be

a concern.

 

Ambulance Driver will do its best to alleviate the employer’s concerns over this website’s content and is confident that the situation can be worked out to the satisfaction of both parties. This has been submitted to an attorney familiar with HIPAA law and inquiries made to my Congressman in an effort to obtain a definitive answer to this question. All material will be shared with this blog’s readers and with the employer.

 

If any of my millions of readers have any comments, please feel free to share.

 

Written by Duke

March 6th, 2009 at 2:50 pm

Concerns Over Patient Confidentiality

with 3 comments

A reader, who claims to be a health care professional, has anonymously declared that this blog violates the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA,  as it relates to patient confidentiality.

Insuring that a patient’s protected health information is kept private has been my greatest concern. It is my understanding that as long as the information presented here cannot be linked to a specific individual patient, then there is no HIPAA violation.

To protect a patient’s confidentiality, I have set up some rules for myself which include:

  • No ages – just a general description, such as elderly.
  • No addresses – not even the city.
  • If the patient does not speak English, they are described as non-English speaking. No nationalities are reported.
  • Specific hospital destinations are not given
  • If I am on a scene that will probably make the 6 o’clock news, I will simply say, “I was there.”

It seems to me that if any personal information is to be linked to a specific patient,  it would have to be released by my employer. There is no way it can be gleaned from the stories told on Ambulance Driver.

It must be said, however, that the rules are arcane and can be interpreted in some very odd-sounding ways. Two examples come to mind.

  1. At the scene of an auto accident, I can tell the police that the patient has a broken leg but I cannot tell them that I suspect the patient has been drinking. They have to figure it out themselves.
  2. Cell phone cameras are great for bringing visual images from the scene to the hospital. Vehicle damage from wrecks, height of a fall, or the length of a knife that the patient was stabbed with are just some examples of information that is valuable to hospital staff. Our medical director will not allow this use due to HIPAA concerns.

I am asking several individuals and entities, whose job includes HIPAA concerns, to review this blog’s content. Unless there are good reasons to stop, I am going to carry on with my 911 Updates.

Written by Duke

March 3rd, 2009 at 6:28 pm

911 Update

with 2 comments

There are some days where one is almost embarrassed to accept payment for the day’s work. Today was such a day.

  • Call #1 A man called 911 complaining of shortness of breath. He met us at the curb, loudly insulted the female first responders and hopped into the back of the ambulance. After making the suggestion that he might want to tone it down a bit, our exam indicated that he was not the least bit dyspnic. However, further questioning did reveal that he had been drinking (BAC .156% at the hospital), suffered from bipolar disorder and had not been taking his medications. He got a rather expensive taxi ride to the hospital.
  • Call #2…..there was no Call #2  -  or Call #3 for that matter.

The Department was quiet during my 8 hour shift. We fielded only 35 calls during this period.

Written by Duke

March 3rd, 2009 at 5:39 pm

Posted in 911 Update

Some Points of Clarification

with 3 comments

As I read through my first blog posts, it seems to me that some explanation is in order. While it may appear that The Ambulance Driver is doing all this work himself, nothing could be further from the truth.

On many calls we have dual responses; either police or the fire department and sometimes both show up. Who responds to a 911 call is determined by the call takers and the various department’s dispatchers. Much of the determination for who responds to EMS calls is determined by the Medical Director for the system.

On medicals, the paramedic/attendant is in charge of patient care. The medic directs the actions of the other first responders at the scene. Having said this, we do work as a team and the work could not be done in a efficient manner without them. Even though they do have less training than the medics, the first responders we work with are experienced and very capable.

In our ambulance department each medic generally works with two regular partners – one on one day, the other the next. The day is split up in a manner agreeable to both medics but the most common practice is to trade driver/attendant positions after every transport.

I have the pleasure of working with 2 very seasoned paramedics. Between the three of us we have well over 100 years of ambulance experience. Yes, we are old. But despite our failing eyes and minds, we still have strong backs and an enduring enthusiasm for the work we do. Well… most of the time anyway.

Written by Duke

March 1st, 2009 at 6:44 pm

Posted in 911 Update

911 Update

without comments

Our service answered 78 calls during my 12 hour, 5a-5p shift today. Since I spent a lot of time in suburbia, my unit was only dispatched to five of them.

  • Call # 1 was for a young lady that couldn’t be awakened by her husband this morning. He thought that she had been drinking last evening and may also have taken an OD of her sleep aid. We were able to rouse her enough to make a determination that she was intoxicated, but could not find any pill bottle that could help us determined whether she had overdosed. We later learned that her blood alcohol was 0.35%. BAC’s of this magnitude are the hallmark of a chronic inebriate. Unfortunately we see a lot of this and in many folks one wouldn’t consider drunks.
  • Call #2 was a nursing home patient with abdominal pain. Our exam discovered a prominent hernia that staff was unaware of and its presence did not appear in her history. She may have a strangulated bowel since the mass was hard and firm. Kinda weird.
  • Call #3 was for a lady who went to a “stand alone” urgent care clinic with vague complaints of chest pain. Not obviously cardiac and EKG appeared normal. Women with cardiac problems, however, are notorious for being hard to diagnose so the physician opted to send her in for further evaluation.
  • Call #4 was for a elderly fellow with a long history of emphysema. He had gone to his clinic for increased breathing difficulty over the past few days. The clinic treated him and thought he need to go to an emergency room. So what did they do? They sent him to the hospital in a private vehicle driven by his daughter (insert mirth-less chuckle by typist here). She gets lost and ends up at a gas station where she calls 911 due to her dad’s increased shortness of breath. By the time we arrived the poor guy is in pretty tough shape. Quiet chest on auscultation, no chest movement, can’t talk, is weak and has grunting expirations. We have a couple of treatment options but decided to neb him with atrovent and albuterol. This apparently was the correct choice since he was much better in a very short time.
  • Call #5 was for a nursing home patient with persistent pneumonia that was not responding to antibiotics and had made several back and forth visits to the hospital in the past couple of weeks. This was just another one trip.

Well, that’s it. Just another run-of-the-mill day.

Written by Duke

February 28th, 2009 at 6:11 pm

Posted in 911 Update

911 Update

with 5 comments

Quiet day at the ambulance service – just 56 runs during my 5am-5pm shift. We snagged only five of them.

  • Call #1 was for an elderly man who fell out of bed at the nursing home. Had significant skin tears on both arms. Has been taking Prednisone for a while which makes a person susceptible to such injury.
  • Call #2 was a lady who fell at another nursing home. She had left hip pain but no obvious fracture. Patient has a history of frequent falls.
  • Call #3 was for a “one down” which usually turns out to be someone passed out in a drunken stupor. The police beat us to the scene and cancelled us as we arrived.
  • Call #4 was an auto accident in a suburban community. Car was T-boned by an SUV at an intersection. The auto had very heavy damage to front passenger door. The car’s driver was complaining of right chest pain. Both drivers insisted that they had the green light when the accident occurred. Patient was taken to the hospital but will do just fine.
  • Call #5 was a middle age male with chest pain with no other symptoms. He  had a normal looking 12 Lead EKG and pain not relieved by nitro. Did not appear to be cardiac in origin.

All patients were transported to area hospitals. Kind of a hum-drum day.

Written by Duke

February 27th, 2009 at 6:02 pm

Posted in 911 Update

Welcome to Ambulance Driver

without comments

This blog will contain a diary of my work as a Paramedic for a urban ambulance service and musings concerning public policy.

Written by Duke

February 27th, 2009 at 5:35 pm

Posted in 911 Update